Unsorted FBI Documents

Attachment to Independent Case Review Report
For CDRU # 6277 Case File # 95-248596 .

Material Examiner: Malone (R0~)

Remarks:

Trial was conducted but no transcript was provided.

b6

b7C

1

CRM - 13074

INDEPENDENT CASE REVIEW REPORT

Independent Review conducted by: Steve Robertson

Area(s) of Expertise: Hair and Fiber

Review commenced at: 12:30 PM (Time), 03/14/2001 (Date)

File #: 95-248596

Laboratory #(s): 20322 1 12

Examiner(s) & Symbols

Reviewed

Not Reviewed

Reviewed

Not Reviewed

RQ

Xo

□

o

□

□

a

□

□

□

□

o

□

Materials Reviewed

Trial testimony transcript(s) of: _

Testimony Date(s): Pages:

Laboratory Reports):

Laboratory Number:

20322112

Date: June 11, 19982

Laboratory Number:

Date:

Laboratory Number:

Date:

Examiner Bench Notes of:

RQ

Laboratory Number:

20322112

Page 1 of 3

:

CRM - 13075

Initials

V.

Vitas' any other material reviewed? Xo Yes

□ No

If yes, please identify and/or describe the material: Submitting agency letter (dated 3-17-82)

Results of Review

File #: 95-248596

Item or Specimen # Reviewed: Q 1 , Q2, K 1 -K3

Review of Laboratory Report(s) and Bench Notes:

Note: Numbered comments are required below or on
additional pages for any “No” or “Unable to Determine” Responses

1) Did the examiner perform the appropriate tests in a scientifically acceptable manner, based on the
methods, protocols, and analytic techniques available at the time of the original examination(s)?

Xd Yes □ No □ Unable to Determine

2) Are the examination results set forth in the laboratory report(s) supported and adequately documented in

the bench notes? □ Yes X □ No □ Unable to Determine

Review of Testimony:

Note: Numbered comments are required below or on
additional pages for any “No” or “Unable to Determine” Responses

Xn

Transcript not available.

3)

Testimony consistent with the laboratory report(s)?

\

□ Yes

□ No

□ Unable to Determine

4)

Testimony consistent with the bench notes?

□ Yes

□ No

□ Unable to Determine

5)

Testimony within bounds of examiner’s expertise?

□ Yes

□ No

□ Unable to Determine

Page 2 of 3

Initials:

Comments

(Set forth by above question #, if applicable.
Use “Additional Comments” Sheet, if needed)

File#: 95-248596

#2: The examination results set forth in the laboratory report are supported by the bench notes, but the

documentation is marginally adequate. The notes are not dated or initialed and are in pencil.

The conclusion that the green fibers recovered from the vehicle microscopically match the fibers from the

victim’s jacket is not documented in the notes.

The technician apparently performed solubility testing on the Q2 and K 2 fibers.

Review completed at: 1:00 PM (Time), 03/14/2001

(Date)

Total time spent conducting review (to nearest 1/4 hour):

0:30 hours

I hereby certify that I conducted this review in an independent, unbiased manner and that the results of my review
are*fully documented on this report consisting of a total of 3 pages.

(Signature)

03/14/2001

(Date)

Page

3 of 3

Initials: